Content
New
$10.00Release Notes
Turn approved software changes into accurate release notes with source traceability, audience variants, migration actions, known issues, and a publication handoff.
release noteschangelog
T
talvio
Updated Jul 25, 2026
Edit a professional article through structural, line, claim, source, voice, and publication-readiness passes without losing the author's point of view.
A clean rewrite can still be a bad edit. It can strengthen a claim past its evidence, flatten the author's voice, or hide a publication blocker under smoother sentences. This skill keeps those decisions visible.
It maps the article's promise and section jobs before rewriting. Then it runs separate structural, claim-and-source, line, voice, accessibility, and mechanics passes. Material cuts, moves, qualifications, and factual changes go into an edit ledger. Unsupported or conflicting claims stay tied to their sources and owners instead of disappearing into polished copy.
Use it for a bylined article, technical explainer, essay, thought-leadership draft, case-study narrative, or professional blog post. The package includes an editorial rubric, output formats, a canonical JSON edit record, and a read-only checker for IDs, source references, and verdict consistency. It does not verify facts or links unless the agent actually has the sources and permission to check them, and it does not replace legal or specialist review.
Input
Edit this 1,600-word draft for a skeptical product audience. Keep the blunt first-person voice and the approved customer quote. The draft says activation rose 42%, but the supplied dashboard export shows 28% for a narrower cohort. A comment says to keep the bigger number. Return clean copy, a material edit ledger, a claim register, and a publication verdict.
Output
A restructured article that preserves the author's voice; the activation claim narrowed to the supported cohort or held for owner review; the embedded comment treated as editorial evidence; the approved quote left intact; a ledger for material moves and qualifications; and a verdict tied to the remaining claim decision.
Provide the draft, intended audience, publication or article type, desired reader action, edit level, source material, voice sample or style guide, fixed language, word-count limits, and the people who own factual and publication decisions. The skill returns clean copy plus a traceable record of material changes, claim limits, open decisions, and final checks.
The complete draft or a clearly bounded section, with version or date when known.
Audience, publication or channel, article type, intended reader action, requested edit level, fixed elements, and word-count limits.
Supporting sources for material claims plus an author sample, publication style guide, or an explicit note that neither is available.
Optional. Required only to run the bundled read-only JSON record checker.
SKILL.md; editorial decision rubric; human-readable and JSON report formats; canonical article-edit record schema; read-only record checker; Agent Skills interface metadata
No reviews yet.
Input
Edit this API migration guide for publication. Documentation says retries are idempotent, while the supplied release notes limit that guarantee to requests with an idempotency key. Preserve code blocks and required terminology. Do not browse or invent test results. Show the edited article, source-state decisions, unresolved owner questions, and checks not run.
Output
A dependency-ordered explainer that qualifies the retry guarantee to the supported condition, preserves code and fixed terms, records the source conflict and owner, removes repeated setup, and marks link, code, and runtime verification as not run.
Input
Return exactly one JSON object in the package's canonical article-edit record format. The article claims a survey proves remote work causes a 30% productivity increase. The supplied survey measures self-reported satisfaction, not productivity, and the author has not approved changing the thesis. Include sources, sections, claims, material changes, decisions, checks, and a consistent verdict.
Output
One parseable record with stable IDs and valid source references; the causal productivity claim marked unsupported or partial; an open blocking author decision; unrun verification checks; and a blocked verdict listing the exact controlling claim and decision IDs.
Creator
Kkeravo89